 
 
Everybody talks about the weather, but nobody 
  does anything about it. 
   Mark Twain
As I write this column in late June, choking plumes of smoke blanket the West, 
  stinging the eyes of evacuees fleeing the approaching flames and the firefighters 
  sent to quench them. Several years of below-average rainfall and hot weather 
  have made many parts of the country a tinderbox. As a result, the 2002 fire 
  season is off to a fearsome start. 
  
  Meanwhile, from Montana to Oklahoma and beyond, farmers are fighting a losing 
  battle to keep their crops alive. No one dares mention a return to the Dust 
  Bowl of the 1930s, but fear lingers. When the rains finally do fall, it is often 
  in sheets, causing rivers to overflow as they did during the summer of 2001 
  in Grundy, Va., turning Main Street into a raging torrent. Or the rains come 
  with tornadoes or hurricane-force winds.
  
  Humanitys battle with the elements is cliché, but losses of life 
  and property caused by severe weather are real, and demand a response. Currently, 
  the U.S. Global Change Research Program assesses long-term climate change, while 
  NOAA and other agencies engage in short-term weather prediction. But somewhere 
  between knowing the climatic conditions facing future generations and knowing 
  whether to pack sunscreen or an umbrella today is an area of climate assessment 
  that deserves greater attention.
Did someone say, No regrets?
In May 2001, this column called for a new approach to climate policy: sidestep 
  the political controversy and impasse surrounding atmospheric carbon dioxide, 
  and focus instead on strategies that help people and communities. This proposed 
  strategy is not meant to undermine continued research on carbon dioxide and 
  the variables that control climate change, nor to limit our understanding of 
  current trends. Instead, against a backdrop of ongoing research, it acknowledges 
  the responsibility of scientists to develop effective ways to improve the resilience 
  of people and communities to the impacts of severe weather. By linking what 
  we know about historical trends to our present-day experience, and by connecting 
  seemingly abstract scientific discovery to individual lives, we can advance 
  a comprehensive strategy that leaves no regrets.
  
  H.R. 4900, The Weather Safety Act, recently introduced by Rep. J.C. Watts Jr. 
  (R-Okla.) is such a plan. The bill establishes the National Climate Change Vulnerability 
  and Resilience Program coordinated through an Office of Climate Change Vulnerability 
  and Resilience Research. The program would review all existing climate change 
  and vulnerability research being conducted across the U.S. Global Change Research 
  Program and other appropriate federal, state and local agencies. 
  This knowledge will help in assessing the vulnerabilities our nation and individual 
  regions face from phenomena associated with long-term climatic change and shorter-term 
  climatic variation, including:
Accessing the currently available science on these issues, the Office will 
  produce Vulnerability Scorecards that identify each States vulnerability 
  and capacity to respond to such hazards. These assessments will present a clear 
  picture of how prepared a region is for extreme weather, establishing a baseline 
  for judging future improvements. Such improvements could include better flood 
  maps to permit more effective zoning in flood plains; or identifying gaps in 
  scientific knowledge where focused research can enhance a states resilience 
  to severe weather.
  
  Too often our national response to severe weather events is reactive. In the 
  aftermath, the federal government declares the affected region a disaster area, 
  and provides an infusion of relief funds. Assisting in the recovery of these 
  communities is important. At the same time, the Weather Safety Act advocates 
  a more proactive approach. The Office will develop short- and long-term strategies 
  at all levels of government to reduce threats to human life and property, avoid 
  negative economic impacts, and improve resilience to these hazards. Through 
  ongoing evaluation, continued research, and consultation with local, state and 
  national officials, the Office will refine these strategies based on newly available 
  science and experience, creating a feedback mechanism that, over time, should 
  lead to improved resilience of our nations people and communities to the 
  impact of severe weather. 
Stronger communities, stronger nation
Farmers need to know whether to plant drought-resistant crops. City planners 
  need to work to prevent flooding. The first responders in emergencies need to 
  analyze evacuation routes. The Weather Safety Act should dramatically improve 
  their ability to plan effectively. 
  
  In filling this need, this program creates a bridge between scientists and Americas 
  community leaders in two ways: First, by identifying the relevant research programs 
  and aggregating them under one roof to evaluate current scientific understanding; 
  second, by developing immediately applicable strategies that use this knowledge 
  to benefit society. Furthermore, this process will be ongoing, where community 
  leaders educate the scientific community on the challenges they face, thus informing 
  the research process. This feedback should forge a partnership that demonstrates 
  the importance and relevance of science to our citizens lives. But the 
  benefits neednt stop there. 
  
  The pursuit of more resilient communities  those able to withstand adversity 
   is important to America. It requires the involvement and cooperation 
  of every facet of society, from public to private, and from scientist to city 
  official. Ideally, this partnership to minimize the impact of severe weather 
  will provide a model to successfully address other critical issues facing the 
  nation. In our society, vulnerabilities are numerous and put people and communities 
  at risk. The trick is to eliminate the vulnerabilities we can, and prepare for 
  those that we cannot. Weve got a lot to do, especially in the scientific 
  community. Lets get to work.
|  | Geotimes Home | AGI Home | Information Services | Geoscience Education | Public Policy | Programs | Publications | Careers  |