Tree
rings measure radiation
Drilling wells
to monitor uranium contamination is a big, expensive job. Two geologists at
the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill may have found an alternative
solution. A study by Drew Coleman and his graduate student Michael Bulleri suggests
geologists can measure radiation much more cheaply by analyzing tree cores.
[At right, Mike Bulleri cores an oak tree
in North Carolina. Courtesy of Drew Coleman.]
Uranium occurs naturally in soil and groundwater, as well as in a depleted form
from contamination. Trees take up water from the ground and store radioactive
elements for many years. By comparing isotopic ratios within the tree cores,
Coleman and Bulleri could distinguish between natural and depleted uranium species.
They presented their work at the annual Geological Society of America
meeting in November.
Bulleri cored oak trees located on public and private lands surrounding a depleted
uranium weapons manufacturing site outside Concord, Mass. He and Coleman measured
uranium concentrations in the living parts of the oaks, called sapwood, using
a thermal ionization mass spectrometer and a technique known as isotope dilution.
Coleman says the data they collected show that trees store uranium in both their
bark and their wood. “We’ve been able to demonstrate with both uranium and lead
that the oaks are sampling two distinct contaminant sources that we assume are
near surface water, in the wood; and airborne particles, in the bark.”
The average uranium concentration in the sapwood of one tree matched that found
in an adjacent well over the same interval. Also, Coleman says, uranium levels
rose rapidly in the tested sapwood located next to contaminated groundwater
plumes and dropped to zero a short distance away, except in areas of high airborne
transport and in an area with anomalously high concentrations of depleted uranium
in air. Coleman says this anomalous area is critical in showing
the value of the core testing, because it revealed an area of contamination
in groundwater that was otherwise unexpected. “Because trees provide such a
rapid, inexpensive tool for tracking the contaminant, it would be easy to identify
other such ‘unexpected’ concentrations,” he says.
He emphasizes, though, that their work is relatively new, and they have many
unanswered questions. Future plans for the research include investigating if
tree species other than oak are better for monitoring uranium, learning where
the uranium is stored and how it moves, and testing their method at more contaminated
sites.
Still, with each tree analysis costing under $100, Coleman says, the team has
high hopes for using tree coring as an alternative to well drilling to monitor
nuclear and radioactive sites across the United States. “The fact that we can
sample so quickly over so broad an area and that there is no experiment to set
up to accomplish this is exciting to me,” Coleman says. “The trees have been
collecting our samples for decades. All we need to do is extract the data from
them.”
Lisa M. Pinsker
Seismicity
from Sept. 11
Seismometers at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades,
N.Y., detected seismic waves generated Sept. 11 by the impact of two commercial
airliners into the World Trade Center and the subsequent collapse of the twin
towers. Although the ground motions caused by the buildings’ collapse were consistent
with the energy produced by a small earthquake, they were probably not strong
enough to cause damage to surrounding buildings, says a paper in the Nov. 20
issue of Eos written by twelve Lamont researchers.
The local magnitudes of the aircraft impacts were 0.9 and 0.7, resulting in
little ground shaking. The tower collapses, in contrast, registered magnitudes
of 2.1 and 2.3, comparable to a small earthquake that occurred beneath the east
side of Manhattan on Jan. 17, 2001. “The energy of the collapse came from the
stored gravitational potential energy of the buildings. As the towers collapsed,
the majority of this energy was absorbed in the destruction of the buildings
themselves, producing the debris cloud,” says Klaus Jacob, a co-author and senior
research scientist for the Division of Geology and Geophysics at Lamont. “Only
a miniscule fraction of the buildings’ potential energy was actually transformed
into seismic wave energy.”
The damage to neighboring buildings was probably caused by projectiles of falling
debris or by the pressure exerted from the dust- and particle-laden blast of
air, the team writes.
While the towers’ collapse resulted in relatively small seismographic recordings,
it was detected by seismic stations in five states and as far as 428 kilometers
away in Lisbon, N.H.
Neeta Bijoor
Geotimes contributing writer
![]() |
Geotimes Home | AGI Home | Information Services | Geoscience Education | Public Policy | Programs | Publications | Careers ![]() |