From Magnetism to Meteorites: Research at the Poles
Geotimes staff

As part of the International Geophysical Year in 1957, several countries cooperated to send research expeditions to Antarctica, jump-starting scientific research on the continent. Two years later, 12 nations signed the Antarctic Treaty, an agreement that the continent will be used for peaceful purposes only and as a place for scientific research. By 2000, 45 countries had signed onto the treaty. The continent has been an active science laboratory. According to the Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs, 26 different countries host 82 research stations in Antarctica.

Security issues and natural resources have driven U.S. research interests at the other pole — a history that starts in 1897 with the purchase of Alaska. In 1984, to better coordinate federal research in the polar region, Congress passed the Arctic Research and Policy Act. The National Science Foundation became a lead agency for implementing Arctic research policy, and soon formed the Office of Polar Programs.

Geoscientists working at the poles are unraveling Earth’s history — from very old records of mountain belts and plate motions, to relatively recent records of climate change stored in ice cores. The following suite of articles provides a glimpse at three areas where current research is making strides. Geophysicists studying Earth’s magnetic field are taking to the poles to understand a rapid decrease in magnetic field intensity. The snowy expanses of Antarctica and Greenland are prime hunting ground for geoscientists studying meteorites, providing a chilly window into the origin of the solar system and beyond. And remote sensing has revolutionized our ability to measure the total size of ice sheets and how that size is changing.

Deciphering Earth's dicey dipole
Meteorites on ice
An expanding view of polar ice sheets

Deciphering Earth's dicey dipole

In October 2000, Discover magazine ranked the top 20 ways the world could end. At number six was a reversal of Earth’s magnetic field. The magnetic field, created by convection in Earth’s fluid outer core, forms a protective shield around the planet, blocking out harmful solar radiation and particles from deep space. Every few hundred thousand years, the field intensity drops down close to zero and then gradually reappears with the poles at opposite ends of the globe. The magnetic poles form the northern and southern ends of an imaginary giant bar magnet.

University of Rochester students Karrie Weaver (left) and Doug Laity wait for helicopter transport on Axel Heiberg Island in the High Canadian Arctic, on an expedition to measure the intensity of the ancient magnetic field from lava basalts. Some researchers think the field is on the brink of a reversal, and the ancient data provide additional evidence. University of Rochester.

“On geological time-scales, Earth’s magnetic field, grossly dipolar, presents stable polarity intervals, with duration on the order of a few hundreds of thousands of years, interrupted by sharp reversals from one polarity to the other,” says geophysicist Mioara Mandea of the Institut de Physique du Globe in Paris. The latest reversal happened nearly one million years ago, which has many researchers wondering whether Earth is due for a magnetic flip soon.

Some geophysicists, who have noticed a rapid decline in the strength of Earth’s magnetic field, say the field is showing signs of an imminent reversal. Others, however, argue that the field’s intensity could easily bounce back.

“Where we’re on solid footing is that the overall intensity of Earth’s magnetic field is decreasing, and it’s decreasing quite rapidly. It’s actually decreasing more rapidly than if we turn the convection in the core off and let the field decay away,” says John Tarduno, a geophysics professor at the University of Rochester. “That does not necessarily tell you that you’re heading toward a reversal.”

If the field intensity continues as it has, it will reach zero intensity in 2,000 years or so, Tarduno says. But, he cautions, the field’s intensity, even though it’s decreasing very rapidly, is higher than the long-term average. Also, “there are many times in the records we have so far, where the record appears to be dropping rapidly and then increases again,” says Tarduno, who conducts research up near the North Magnetic Pole, located about 966 kilometers from the geographic North Pole, and moving northwest about 40 kilometers per year, according to a recent survey (Geotimes, May 2002).

The North Pole is the birthplace of geomagnetic research, which began in the 19th century. Roald Amundsen, on his search for the Northwest Passage, set up a temporary magnetic observatory to relocate the pole found 70 years earlier by James Clark Ross. Now, geomagnetic researchers look at Earth’s magnetic field in a variety of ways — from space, from computer simulations and right from the source in the cold, remote Arctic.

Tarduno and his students have ventured up to the Arctic four times over the past decade to reconstruct the history of Earth’s magnetic field as recorded in lava basalts near the pole. “Most of our work is geared at understanding the long-term history of the magnetic field as well as understanding the basic relationships between the characteristics of the field, which have been hard to define,” he says.

They measured the paleointensity of the magnetic field from plagioclase crystals in arctic lavas 95 million years old that represent a superchron, a time period without magnetic reversal for millions of years. “What we’ve found is that during this time interval, the field appears to be unusually strong — two to three times stronger than the long-term average of the field, over the last 160 million years, and it seems to be remarkably stable,” Tarduno says.

Their work, published in the Oct. 29 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and funded by the National Science Foundation and Canada’s Polar Continental Shelf Project, therefore suggests that magnetic field intensity is related to other components of the field, including the rate of reversal.
Recent and prior work with satellite data has highlighted other possible relationships in the magnetic field that could point toward a reversal. This past April, Gauthier Hulot, Mandea and colleagues published in Nature the presence of patches of reversed magnetic intensity in the Southern Hemisphere, which may have something to do with the decrease in field intensity over the past couple hundred years, and could be precursors to a dipole reversal.

Tarduno’s team looked for evidence of similar patches of disturbances in the ancient magnetic field but did not find any. “We believe it is because the field was in an unusually strong and stable — non-reversing — configuration,” Tarduno says.

Researchers think that the convection in the outer core, which drives the magnetic field, creates these patches. “What you need to do is maintain that pattern in the outer core long enough so that the reversal can actually propagate through the inner core. That’s the trick,” Tarduno says.

Indeed, Gary Glatzmaier of the University of California at Santa Cruz says that instabilities such as the Southern Hemisphere patches are common in “geodynamo” simulations, but do not usually survive. “Once in many attempts the fluid flow and thermodynamics happen to be right for instability to continue to grow while the original field polarity is being destroyed and sometimes, after several thousands of years, this reversed polarity can take over the entire core,” he explains. “The process of a dipole reversal is very complicated and chaotic and I would imagine there’s no simple explanation.”

Tarduno hopes to return to the Arctic soon to learn more about Earth’s geomagnetic past and the geodynamo that charged it. Although he does not expect a dipole reversal in the immediate future, he does say that the patches of reversed flux in the South Atlantic have been causing and will continue to cause more radiation to hit satellites above those regions.

Lisa M. Pinsker

Back to top

Meteorites on ice

Stellar explosions of red giants and supernovas send star dust careening through the universe. For billions of years the galactic grains travel away from their solar systems. More than a thousand times smaller than sand, the tiny diamonds and other minerals carry an encrypted message: noble gases with the atomic signatures of their parent star.

Eventually the dust travels through the Milky Way Galaxy to another solar system — one early in its formation. The dust becomes part of a growing cloud of molecular material forming planets, the Sun and asteroids. It is these asteroids, between Jupiter and Mars, that have locked the secrets of other solar systems away for 4.5 billion years. But often chunks of the asteroids break off and spin in a collision course toward the Sun, only to crash en route instead on the Moon or any planets that might cross their paths. Of the ones that hit Earth, only a small fraction make it through the atmosphere and even fewer are ever found.

Jamie Pierce (left) and John Schutt are part of the Antarctic Search for Meteorites program. Here, they recover the largest ordinary chrondrite (20 kilograms) of the 2001-2002 season. They are pictured here on the Meteorite Hills icefield, Darwin Mountains, East Antarctica. ANSMET/Linda Martel.

Astronomers have gazed through their telescopes to learn of the birth of stars and poets have written about dust trails from comets that blaze as meteor showers in the night sky, while meteorites quietly have accumulated on the frozen ice sheets of Antarctica.

Japanese glaciologists first discovered the bounty there for the taking in 1969. After hearing about nine specimens from four different types of meteorites the Japanese scientists reported finding, William Cassidy of the University of Pittsburgh asked the National Science Foundation (NSF) to fund a similar expedition near the American base at McMurdo Sound. NSF, however, rejected the idea, twice. The third time was the charm.

Since Cassidy’s first two-person expedition in 1976, the Antarctic Search for Meteorites (ANSMET) program Cassidy established with NSF support has brought back 11,647 meteorites, including six martian meteorites and the first identified lunar meteorites. With the Japanese collection counting now at 16,500, nearly 90 percent of the currently known samples collected on the planet have come from Antarctica.

Each austral summer, the team of meteorite hunters travels to McMurdo Station and prepares for six weeks of field camp in remote sections of the continent. The cost of the expedition runs about $120,000 per person. “That includes everything: six weeks on the ice, two weeks there and back traveling, insurance, every drop of fuel for the planes, room and board at McMurdo — people forget how much it costs to do research on Antarctica, but we’re pretty cheap compared to a lot of other projects,” says Ralph Harvey of Case Western Reserve University, who began leading ANSMET in 1991 as principal investigator of the grants after Cassidy retired.

This season, for the first time, NASA is joining NSF in supporting the ANSMET fieldwork. The additional funding has allowed a reconnaissance team of four to scout out the Transantarctic Mountains near the South Pole with the aid of a Twin Otter plane. A larger team of eight is using snowmobiles to conduct systematic searches of the Transantarctic Mountains in two regions: Goodwin Nunataks and MacAlpine Hills, both about a day’s journey from the Beardmore Glacier. Harvey calls the organized grid-pattern search akin to a giant Easter egg hunt. The team members are lined up on their snowmobiles about 50 feet apart and set off in parallel lines across the Polar Plateau.

The Antarctic Ice Cap receives meteorites on its surface and then over hundreds of thousands of years smuggles them into its deep interior while the ice creeps slowly across the continent. An unknown number are lost at sea where the ice travels over the continental edge and breaks into icebergs. But in areas such as near the Transantarctic Mountains, where the wind whips the ice into a frozen ocean of brilliant blue, ablating the upper layer through evaporation, the meteorites are revealed once more.

Before the expedition, Scott Messenger joined others at McMurdo station over the Thanksgiving weekend for a 5-kilometer foot race. While Messenger will have a snowmobile to help him with the meteorite hunt, the race put the team in good spirits. With clear weather on Dec. 7, they returned from their first day of collecting with 21 meteorites.

Back at Washington University in St. Louis, Messenger is one of a growing number of researchers working in a new field studying interstellar grains and their bizarre records of noble gasses. The first indication that meteorites held interstellar material occurred in the 1960s when researchers found unusual isotopic ratios of the elements neon and xenon. “Something strange was spooking around in the meteorites,” says Edward Anders, now retired from the University of Chicago. When heated under extreme temperatures the noble gasses escaped with wildly ranging isotopic ratios unknown to this solar system. “Meteorites are a god-awful mix of the whole periodic table.”

Anders and his team had a hunch that the mysterious mineral might be pentlandite, which the text books claimed could withstand acid. While William Cassidy was struggling to persuade NSF to fund ANSMET in the early 1970s, Anders and his team soaked meteorites in an acid bath overnight until all that was left was a black residue. The first test showed successfully that the strange noble gases still remained. But the black mineral residue wasn’t pentlandite. “We had a long tradition of doing the right experiment for the wrong reason,” Anders says. After 12 years of working on and off the project to identify this black sludge, it took a technological fluke for his team to discover at least one of the minerals in the meteorites that could hold such gases.

In 1987, John Wacker, a post-doc on the project, left a fresh sample of this black residue on a hot plate overnight to dry and further tease out the mystery ingredients. But when the thermometer malfunctioned and the hot plate became much hotter than it was set for, “the next morning the black stuff turned white and the noble gases were still there,” Anders recalls. Another post-doc, Roy Lewis, checked out the X-ray diffraction pattern and saw lines of diamonds. “Of all things, diamonds,” Anders remembers.

Working with colleagues who had access to an ion microprobe at Washington University, the researchers identified silicon carbide and graphite as also carrying the noble gasses from another solar system. Other researchers have since identified four more presolar grain minerals. In 2000 Messenger presented a way to find presolar grains caught in Earth’s atmosphere using high-altitude aircraft.

On the horizon, the meteorite hunters are looking for something else too: meteorites from Mercury and Venus. Theory has it that the meteorites exist, indeed they might already sit in the collections at the Johnson Space Center or at the Smithsonian categorized as ungrouped meteorites. But nobody knows yet just what special link will identify them, or just where on the ice sheet they may turn up.

Christina Reed

Back to top
An expanding view of polar ice sheets

The Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets hold a vast amount of Earth’s freshwater. If the two sheets melted completely, they would raise the sea level by almost 70 meters. Even a fractional change in the volume of the sheets would significantly impact sea level. One of the major research efforts at high latitudes is to understand how polar ice sheets will respond to a climate likely to warm over the next century.

The overall scientific picture of the polar ice caps, as summarized in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment published in 2001, is that Greenland and Antarctica may contribute up to a maximum of 11 centimeters to sea-level rise over the next century. However, uncertainty underlies these projections. Ice sheets shrink when more mass is lost from melting and glacier discharge than is gained from precipitation; they grow when that balance shifts in favor of precipitation. Since global climate change could increase precipitation over the poles, the IPCC assessment concluded that the polar ice sheets may not contribute to a rise in sea level at all. They may even offset a rise from other mechanisms — such as thermal expansion of ocean water and melting of nonpolar glaciers — by as much as 19 centimeters.

Glaciologists took this picture as they flew over Patagonian ice fields on Dec. 7. The flight was part of a joint effort between Centro de Estudios Cientificos of Chile and NASA to remotely measure ice thinning rates of glaciers in Antarctica and Patagonia. CECS/NASA.

A major source of uncertainty in projecting the growth or decline of ice sheets is that Greenland and Antarctica span immense areas; but precipitation patterns, melting rates and glacier velocities — the parameters that control the size of the ice sheets — vary over several kilometers. Assembling a comprehensive picture of ice sheet dynamics requires analyzing an entire ice sheet at high resolutions, a daunting task. However, recent advances in remote sensing have rapidly accelerated progress toward a global view of the ice sheets — and their sensitivities to climate changes.

“The past 10 years have revolutionized glaciology through the widespread application of remote sensing to infer conditions over vast areas and over time,” says Robert Thomas, a glaciologist with EG&G Services at NASA in Wallops Island, Va., who has been studying polar ice sheets for about 40 years and co-authored a review in the Aug. 30, 2002, Science of research in Greenland and Antarctica.

A remote-sensing technique called Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) is revealing the speeds of glaciers within the polar ice sheets — data critical for nailing down Antarctica’s overall mass balance. Unlike Greenland, Antarctica is so cold throughout the year that hardly any surface ice melts. The sheet loses mass primarily through glaciers that discharge solid ice into the ocean. With InSAR, satellites emit pulses of microwaves and measure the properties of returning waves to discern features on the ground. Overlapping two or more images separated in time and covering the same section of an ice sheet allows researchers to determine the speeds of glaciers down to an accuracy of a few meters per year.

Eric Rignot, a glaciologist with NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, used InSAR data to show that one of the largest glaciers in Antarctica, Pine Island glacier, has been retreating quickly over the past decade. The glacier has also discharged 18 percent more ice into the ocean per year than it did a decade ago. “Glaciologists had hypothesized that this glacier was one of the most susceptible to possible global climate changes, but there was no good glaciology data to confirm or deny it. Thanks to the satellite data, we’ve been able to look at this glacier without setting a foot on it,” Rignot says. The larger implication, Rignot explains, is that even in Antarctica, glaciers respond to changes in climate on time scales of decades, not in the hundreds or thousands of years assumed by most predictive models of the evolution of the ice sheet in a changing climate.

Other InSAR data indicate that certain sections of the Antarctic ice sheet are growing or not changing in size. Ken Jezek, a glaciologist from Ohio State University, has used InSAR to determine the velocities of ice streams draining into the Filchner Ice Shelf, one of the larger shelves in Antarctica. He and colleagues found that the mass added annually by snow roughly equals the amount discharged to the sea.

Thomas spends many of his research hours cruising over polar ice sheets in a low-flying aircraft. A laser mounted to the plane pulses thousands of times per second, precisely measuring the distance from the plane down to the ice sheet. Since 1991, he and colleagues have been using this technique to develop maps of much of Greenland’s topography. A low frequency radar, also mounted to the plane, complements the topographic data by measuring the thickness of ice down to depths exceeding four kilometers.

By repeating these measurements over time, Thomas and colleagues have been able to determine how much topography and ice thickness has changed in Greenland over the past decade. The results show, according to Thomas, that Greenland is thinning, primarily near the coasts, providing enough water to raise sea level by at least 0.15 millimeters per year, almost 10 percent of the observed global rate of sea level rise (see related story in this issue).

The next generation of polar altimeters has taken to the sky. Last month, NASA launched ICESat, a satellite that will map the topography of polar ice sheets over an area unmatchable by even the most diligent pilot. The satellite’s laser altimeter will determine the average height of parcels of land 60 meters in diameter to within an accuracy of about 10 centimeters. This satellite and other remote sensing techniques will help glaciologists narrow down the uncertainty of how the immense freshwater reserves now locked in these glaciers will respond to a changing climate.

Greg Peterson

Back to top

Geotimes Home | AGI Home | Information Services | Geoscience Education | Public Policy | Programs | Publications | Careers

© 2019 American Geological Institute. All rights reserved. Any copying, redistribution or retransmission of any of the contents of this service without the express written consent of the American Geological Institute is expressly prohibited. For all electronic copyright requests, visit: