 
 
 
 
In October, Geotimes reported on how geoscience issues played into the race 
  for the White House as well as some prominent U.S. Senate races. At the time 
  the story was written, pollsters were telling us that the issues weighing heavily 
  on the minds of voters were the war on terror and the strength of the economy. 
  And while those issues had some impact, along with science topics in some regions, 
  pollsters now tell us voters were most concerned with values issues, such as 
  gay marriage, abortion, gay adoption and stem cell research. These value issues 
  were key in electing a solidly Republican Congress, which goes to session this 
  month. 
  
  Among some key Senate races, incumbency was also a powerful tool: Senators Lisa 
  Murkowski (R-Alaska), Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Ron 
  Wyden (D-Ore.) all kept their congressional seats. Citizens in each of these 
  states were tuned into issues important to the fiscal health and resources of 
  their states and the country  from drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife 
  Refuge to nuclear waste disposal. 
  
  It was a lifestyle issue, however, that in the end proved disastrous 
  for Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D), who lost his seat to then-Rep. John 
  Thune (R), in the hotly contested South Dakota Senate race. Although ethanol 
  production was a hot-button topic, they both supported increased production 
  and use of the alternative fuel to benefit the state's corn-producing farmers. 
  Thus, the energy issue effectively became a moot point in the campaign. Instead, 
  it was Thune's attacks on Daschle's out-of-touch lifestyle, complete 
  with fancy house and expensive cars, which probably turned the tide for Thune. 
  
| Less than one-third of this new class holds a bachelor's degree as their highest educational degree. | 
Thune is part of the new class of Congress  35 new representatives and 
  10 new senators. Like Thune, many of these new members are not new to politics 
  or elected office. Eleven have had long-time careers in elected state government. 
  They have been serving in state houses across the country, in many cases, for 
  several terms. Fully one-third of the new class are lawyers, many of whom served 
  as district attorneys or judges before making a run for Congress. 
  
  Others have advanced degrees in government, higher education, business, theology, 
  divinity, diplomacy, social work and public administration  with three 
  medical doctors, 12 master's degrees holders, and three Ph.D.s. Less than one-third 
  of this new class holds a bachelor's degree as their highest educational degree. 
  These members studied English, history, accounting, political science, economics, 
  business and international relations. Newly elected Rep. Bobby Jindal (R-La.) 
  received his bachelor's degree in biology and public policy from Brown University. 
  He went on to become the Louisiana State Health Secretary. He is the only scientist 
  in this new class and will join an elite fraternity of lawmakers with a science 
  background  less than 2 percent of those serving in the 109th Congress. 
  Scientists who were reelected include physicists Vernon Ehlers (R-Mich.) and 
  Rush Holt (D-N.J.), chemists John W. Olver (D-Mass.) and Barbara Cubin (R-Wyo.), 
  psychologists Tim Murphy (R-Pa.) and Brian Baird (D-Wash.), and human physiology 
  research scientist Roscoe Bartlett (R-Md.). 
  
  Those members not professionally engaged in science, the other 98 percent of 
  Congress, spent their professional lives as public servants, realtors, practicing 
  attorneys, teachers, farmers or ministers. There are three veterans in this 
  class. And two members did not complete college at all, one of whom is Rep. 
  Lynn A. Westmoreland (R) from Newnan, Ga., who calls himself "a real-world 
  lawmaker, not an ivory-tower type." He started a home-building business 
  in the 1970s. He first ran for Congress and lost in 1988. In 1992, he was elected 
  to the Georgia State House of Representatives and rose through the ranks to 
  be Republican leader in 2000. 
  
  Shortly after being sworn in, the new members will be assigned to committees 
  in which they will help craft legislation over the next two years. The 29-member 
  House Steering Committee is responsible for reconfirming sitting chairs and 
  selecting new chairs for House Standing Committees. The House Republican Conference 
  ratifies these choices. The Steering Committee also assigns members to committees, 
  with the exception of the House Rules Committee and the House Administration 
  Committee, which are appointed by the Speaker. The Senate has a similar selection 
  process. 
  
  Assignments are based on seniority first. Then, the Steering Committee will 
  fill committee vacancies by assigning members from the newly sworn-in class 
  of legislators. Sometimes a committee assignment is important because of the 
  district that the member serves. For instance, a member with several military 
  bases in his or her district will likely want to be on the Armed Services Committee. 
  Other times, the Steering Committee assigns members based on their demonstrated 
  interest or expertise in a topic. That's why Republican Reps. Bartlett (who 
  has a Ph.D. in physiology) and Ehlers (who has a Ph.D. in nuclear physics) serve 
  on the House Science Committee.
  
  Whether the new members of Congress will end up on science committees remains 
  to be seen, but regardless, they will be voting on important science policy 
  issues once they come to the floor. The real work will begin after the presidential 
  inauguration on January 20. All legislation that was left incomplete at the 
  end of last year is null and void. All bills must be reintroduced and begin 
  the legislative process anew. 
  
  This year's agenda includes energy legislation, the nuclear waste repository 
  at Yucca Mountain, the proposed reorganization of NOAA, climate change legislation 
  and the reauthorization of the National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Act. Geoscientists 
  have a tremendous opportunity to serve as a much-needed resource for both new 
  and old members of Congress, the vast majority of whom weren't schooled in the 
  earth sciences. The more we engage these members and their staff, the more science 
  will inform their policy decisions.
 
 
|  | Geotimes Home | AGI Home | Information Services | Geoscience Education | Public Policy | Programs | Publications | Careers  |