 
 
 
 
 In August 2004, 
  a mysterious patch of hot soil triggered a forest fire in Southern Californias 
  Los Padres National Forest. A fire crew arrived on the scene and extinguished 
  the fire, which burned 3 acres of land in the rugged backcountry of the Dick 
  Smith Wilder-ness, but crews were baffled by a lingering heat emanating from 
  fissures in the ground.
In August 2004, 
  a mysterious patch of hot soil triggered a forest fire in Southern Californias 
  Los Padres National Forest. A fire crew arrived on the scene and extinguished 
  the fire, which burned 3 acres of land in the rugged backcountry of the Dick 
  Smith Wilder-ness, but crews were baffled by a lingering heat emanating from 
  fissures in the ground. 
  
  Scientists used this tube to collect gas samples from unusual hot cracks in 
  the ground in the Los Padres National Forest in California. Steam beyond the 
  sampling site emanates from hot cracks along the cliff. The hotspot sparked 
  a fire in the park in August 2004. Image courtesy of Robert Mariner. 
  
  
  Despite multiple research expeditions, scientists have been unable to determine 
  the cause of the heat, though they have ruled out volcanic activity and nearby 
  springs. Now, landslide debris and various faults remain the focus of study 
  by Allen King, a U.S. Forest Service geologist, and colleagues, who hope to 
  discover the phenomena responsible for triggering and sustaining the hotspot. 
  
  
  Fire crews initially measured the heat with a candy thermometer, which topped-out 
  at the thermometers 400-degree-Fahrenheit (204-degree-Celsius) limit. 
  When I first heard about it [from King] and he said candy thermometer, 
  I of course kind of laughed, says Robert Mariner, a U.S. Geological Survey 
  hydrologist who studies gases and water associated with volcanoes. 
  
  More recently, equipped with an infrared remote heat sensor, King and colleagues 
  flew by helicopter to the site and measured a maximum temperature of 584 degrees 
  Fahrenheit (307 degrees Celsius) at a spot about 365 centimeters underground. 
  Fifteen months after the fire, the site has only slightly cooled. 
  
  These vents are appreciably above boiling point, Mariner says. You 
  see these occasionally on volcanoes, but its very unusual to see them 
  anywhere else. According to King, the ratios of gases measured  
  carbon dioxide, methane, carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons  dont 
  support volcanic or geothermal spring activity as the source of heat. 
  
  Instead, the leading hypothesis, presented by King at the Geological Society 
  of America annual meeting in Salt Lake City, Utah, in October, was that a 17-acre 
  landslide in the forest in 1998 allowed a chemical reaction to occur. The event 
  churned up Eocene marine shale deposited 56 to 34 million years ago, exposing 
  its iron sulfides to oxygen. This exposure, King says, could have triggered 
  a chemical reaction that allowed the organic materials within the shale to burn. 
  
  
  In the past, debris excavated from mines that contained similar iron sulfides 
  have been known to combust, King says, but our site is a natural phenomenon. 
  Humans didnt have anything to do with it as far as we can tell. 
  
  
  A chemical reaction instigated by the nearby landslide remains the groups 
  best hypothesis, King says, but he is also looking into other possible 
  heat sources, including the regions numerous faults. A major fault exists 
  just over 1 kilometer from the slide area, with smaller faults closer to the 
  site. Combustible gases such as methane might have migrated from the faults 
  to the hotspot in abundances that are not yet apparent at the site, King says. 
  
  
  Pockets of methane associated with the shale could also be a possible contribution, 
  according to James Boles, a sedimentary petrologist at the University of California 
  in Santa Barbara. The extra gas would provide the additional fuel needed to 
  sustain the reaction. 
  
  But whether conditions for combustion arose from iron sulfides in the shale 
  or some other source, researchers remain puzzled by what would have triggered 
  the burning. Its not like somebody was there with a match, 
  Boles says. 
  
  The team hopes that future expeditions to take samples from greater depths, 
  rather than just below the surface, will turn up answers. Were optimistic 
  enough to keep trying, King says. 
Kathryn Hansen
  
 
 
|  | Geotimes Home | AGI Home | Information Services | Geoscience Education | Public Policy | Programs | Publications | Careers  |