Venice upheaval

A new take on an old idea may save Venice yet from being swallowed by the sea. In the Dec. 9 Eos, Giuseppe Gambolati and colleagues at the University of Padua in Italy propose the injection of seawater or carbon dioxide deep into the aquifer beneath Venice to essentially pump up the famed city.

According to the researchers, Venice has experienced a 23-centimeter relative rise in sea level over the past century and now floods close to 100 times per year. Although Venice has been sinking for hundreds of years, over the past century the issue has been exacerbated by two factors: subsidence due to excessive groundwater withdrawal and sea-level rise caused by global climate change.

So far, the only comprehensive plan for saving Venice that has gained the government’s approval and funding is the MOSE project. Begun in May 2003, MOSE consists of a series of 79 mobile barriers that will rest on the bottom of Venice’s three main inlets and will close when tide waters reach above 110 centimeters above the reference sea level (sea level in 1897), preventing storm surges from the Adriatic Sea from entering the lagoon and flooding the city. The 8-year project will cost an estimated 3 billion euros.

But, as reported in the Eos paper, some opponents worry that MOSE is not enough to protect Venice. The opponents also worry that MOSE could endanger the lagoon ecosystem by eliminating natural water circulation when the gates close. Furthermore, the critics note that with a potential global sea-level rise between 9 and 88 centimeters over the next century, according to some predictions, the expensive project would be obsolete.

The Venice lagoon, as viewed from a NASA Landsat satellite 22,000 miles above Earth, is under threat from rising sea levels. One project is already underway to try to protect the ancient city, and other plans — such as seawater or carbon dioxide injection — are also being presented.

Thus, Gambolati and colleagues propose injection, a solution they say “can complement MOSE in duration, safety and frequency of use, and suffers no measurable environmental impact.”

The idea of injecting seawater into the aquifer was first proposed in the 1970s, but was considered unfeasible at the time. Now, Gambolati’s team says that new hydrogeological and geomechanical data plugged into models show that injection can indeed work, “neutralizing almost all of the high tides.”

Venice is built on a group of low-lying islands in a lagoon that is joined to the Adriatic Sea by three major inlets. The city lies atop 1,000 meters of poorly consolidated sands, silts and clays. The brackish and sandy aquifer, 600 to 800 meters below the lagoon, is confined by a 25-meter-thick rock cap.

Gambolati and colleagues contend that uniformly injecting either carbon dioxide or seawater into the aquifer would swell the underlying rocks, thus raising the city between 12 and 30 centimeters. Using carbon dioxide produced by nearby thermal power plants could also help Italy meet its carbon dioxide emissions reduction goal. However, Gambolati says, the injection of seawater is much more likely because it is cheaper, easier and will produce the maximum citywide uplift.

With a 30-centimeter uplift, the researchers say that according to models, only 11 floods above the 110-centimeter mark would have occurred since 1910 — a 94-percent elimination of the “acqua alta,” or high-water floods — which would reduce the necessary use of MOSE and eliminate some of the environmental concerns.

“If it is technically feasible, it can be a good idea, complementary to other projects to save Venice from sea-level rise and flooding,” says Paolo Pirazzoli of the National Center for Scientific Research in France. Pirazzoli has been involved in the scientific efforts to save Venice for years, and suggests raising Venetian street levels or decreasing the inlet water depth to reduce the flooding.

However, Rafael Bras, a hydrologist at MIT who is affiliated with MOSE, says that because Gambolati’s injection theory is based on models of the subsurface, which cannot capture the complex geology beneath Venice, “to argue that you could engineer a controlled lifting of a whole city … is really pushing it.” Bras, who says the arguments against MOSE are erroneous, stresses that the only way to protect Venice and the rest of the region is to separate the Adriatic from the lagoon during floods.

Gambolati recognizes that before his theory can become a reality, further subsurface study is needed. CORILA, a consortium of universities charged with coordinating research activities in the Venetian lagoon, is working with the University of Padua to devise a pilot project for injection, which will take roughly three to four years to complete, Gambolati says.

Megan Sever


CORILA Research Program

Back to top

Geotimes Home | AGI Home | Information Services | Geoscience Education | Public Policy | Programs | Publications | Careers

© 2014 American Geological Institute. All rights reserved. Any copying, redistribution or retransmission of any of the contents of this service without the express written consent of the American Geological Institute is expressly prohibited. For all electronic copyright requests, visit: