As urban centers expand, people build more and more underground spaces that
remain unmapped. Their interconnections during natural hazards such as floods
are a potential threat, according to researchers, who sounded a clarion call
on this hidden vulnerability of large cities at a U.N. conference
held in Tokyo last January.
Relative to geological time scales, urban development in the past century
has taken place extremely fast, said Srikantha Herath, an engineering
professor at the United Nations University, in a press release on Jan. 12. Heraths
colleague Janos Bogardi, director of the universitys Institute for Environment
and Human Security, noted that most urban centers grew up on delta or river
flood plains and other natural-hazard-prone places, such as hillslopes, because
these spaces have rich agricultural land or are otherwise desirable for human
habitation. Many regions may not have experienced extreme events
that would have put their urban construction to the test.
As space becomes limited, Tokyo, New York and other mega-cities
have expanded, by building underground garages or storage spaces, in addition
to underground subways and infrastructure for water, electricity and sewage,
which has increased risks, the researchers say. Japan had 17 incidents
from 1999 to 2001, including some fatalities, during events where flooding may
have spread far from the initial source through underground connected spaces.
The U.N. team is calling for better mapping and integrating the data to determine
how these underground zones might relate to one another.
Most modern construction in the United States is digitally mapped, says Keith
Clarke, a geography professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara,
but not in formats that would be easily incorporated into a larger database
for GIS purposes. Also, he says, older buildings generally are not mapped and
are often a hazard in places such as California, where seismicity is high, but
standards for retrofitting and construction are relatively new. In the Midwest,
Clarke says, there are huge ongoing engineering problems with even the
best-planned holes in the ground, for example, many storm and bomb shelters.
Meanwhile, the U.S. National Geospatial Intelligence Agency is working to map
133 cities, to integrate digital construction plans, critical infrastructure
information and imagery, Clarke says, something the Homeland Security
Department should spearhead. There is little difference between needs
for natural versus human-induced disaster from a data standpoint.
Naomi Lubick
Back to top
![]() |
Geotimes Home | AGI Home | Information Services | Geoscience Education | Public Policy | Programs | Publications | Careers ![]() |