POLITICAL SCENE | October 1996 |
Last year, the National Research Council released the report, Preserving Scientific Data on Our Physical Universe, focusing on the challenges of preserving and managing data collected either by federal agencies or with federal funds. The report concluded that "a general problem prevalent among all scientific disciplines is the low priority attached to data management and preservation by most agencies. Experience indicates that new research projects tend to get much more attention than the handling of data from old ones, even though the payoff from optimal utilization of existing data may be greater."
The big picture
The NGDRS project has focused on preserving seismic data, drill cores, well cuttings, and paper records. Workshop participants explored ways to broaden this effort to include other types of geoscience data that are imperiled, most notably paleontological collections and environmental data.
Voicing concern
Following the workshop, participants met as constituents with their senators and representatives; they also met with key committee staff and federal agency officials. As a result of those meetings, several legislators wrote letters urging their colleagues to support funding for the NGDRS in the FY 1997 appropriations bill now before Congress. Funding for geoscience data preservation was included in the President's budget request for the DOE Fossil Energy R&D program, but the House voted to transfer those and other funds to a gas turbine project sought by General Electric. The Senate restored the funds, and as of early September the two houses had not yet met in conference to work out their differences.
Setting priorities
One question that participants faced on Capitol Hill was why the interest in "old data." The question reflects an assumption that little worth remains after a certain "shelf life" has expired. This assumption is true for some interpreted data, where processing was limited by older technology, and for data that have physically degraded. In many cases, however, historic data -- whether rock cores, fossil collections, or unprocessed seismic tapes -- are as valuable as data collected today as long as they have been properly indexed and catalogued. Much of this material comes from areas where environmental regulations or increased urbanization preclude re-sampling or make it prohibitively expensive. The value of such unique data is immeasurable. These problems with "old data" point up the need for setting priorities -- one of the great hurdles ahead for preserving geoscience data. As one participant suggested, the immediate issue is preservation, but the larger issue is management.
(Position statements developed at the workshop can be found at the AGI web site http://www.agiweb.org )