Geotimes Home | Calendar | Classifieds | Subscribe | Advertise |
Geotimes
Published by the American Geological Institute |
Newsmagazine
of the Earth Sciences
September 2000 |
Welcome to the Geotimes special issue on geoscience education.
This annual issue gives members of the geoscience community an overview
of the major challenges we face in earth-science education and how we can
work together to overcome those challenges. Our cover photo was taken during
the American Geological Institute’s (AGI) first curriculum leadership institute
— which brought together teachers and professors and scientists from state
geological surveys — and provides an excellent metaphor for how the entire
geoscience community can work together to increase opportunities for students
to study Earth.
Curriculum remains a centerpiece of educational reform. Our ability
to meet local and global challenges depends in large part on our success
educating K-12 students and the public about the value of earth-science
information to society as a whole. AGI has reached a milestone with the
release of two K-12 curriculum programs that will expand and enhance earth
science education. At the same time, curriculum is but one tool in the
process of reforming earth-science education. It is now important to get
AGI’s 35 member societies and individual geoscientists to help implement
the curricula.
Teacher professional development is a key component of educational
reform. In the first feature, Michelle Hall-Wallace describes a variety
of efforts that connect University of Arizona undergraduate and graduate
students with Arizona K-12 teachers. Wallace’s program, one of 31 projects
funded by the National Science Foundation’s Graduate K-12 Teaching Fellowships
program, is making excellent headway toward improving science teaching
from kindergarten through graduate school. Her program, she says, could
only happen in a university where science education is a priority, and
she describes how the university’s College of Science has bolstered its
science education staff.
Taking on professional development at the policy level in his Political
Scene column, David Applegate reviews the debates in Congress over how
our (your) federal education dollars are spent. At the center of political
discussion is a move to put funds dedicated to the Eisenhower Professional
Development Program and Eisenhower National Clearinghouse into block grants
to states. The change could allow states to take monies that currently
fund training programs for math and science teachers and use that funding
for other projects, such as playground construction.
The Bay Area Earth Science Institute at San José State University
is an exemplary model for engaging geoscientists in the process of reform.
Richard Sedlock and Ellen Metzger describe how they and colleagues within
the institute have found the most effective methods for reaching teachers.
They offer advice for how geoscientists can become involved in their communities.
National standards for science education emerged in the 1990s through
extensive consensus-building processes involving thousands of stakeholders;
yet states enact reform as they see fit and, in the case of last year’s
debacle in Kansas, in ways inconsistent with the vision and intent of reformers.
In this month’s Comment, geologist and Bible school teacher Michael Howell
reveals how scientists and science educators negotiated the treacherous
slopes of keeping evolution in South Carolina’s K-12 state science standards.
By taking a proactive role, geoscientists ensured that the voice of the
geoscience community was heard throughout the review and adoption process
— and evolution remained in the standards.
Kathryn Johnson addresses the challenges of creating and maintaining
a diverse workforce in science, engineering and technology. She is vice
chair of the congressionally mandated Commission on the Advancement of
Women and Minorities in Science, Engineering and Technology Development.
In July the commission released a report calling for action to increase
the participation of women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in
the science, engineering and technology workforce of the United States.
This month’s Geotimes reflects some of the many important issues
within geoscience education. I think you’ll find its content encouraging,
and I welcome your review and comment.
Michael J. Smith
Geotimes Guest Editor and AGI
Director of Education
Geotimes Home | AGI Home | Information Services | Geoscience Education | Public Policy | Programs | Publications | Careers |