Untitled Document

News Notes
Measuring sea-level rise

In the past few years, residents of Tuvalu, a nation of more than 10,000 people living on South Pacific island atolls, have begun to consider moving their families away. As sea level rises, it threatens to flood the low-lying islands that make up the 10-square-mile country, none of which are higher than 4.5 meters (15 feet) above the ocean.

John Hunter of the Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre at the University of Tasmania perches next to a historic tidal benchmark on the Isle of the Dead (Port Arthur, Tasmania), one of many used to track sea-level changes. Photo by Donna Roberts, Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre.

While Tuvalu may seem to be the extreme example, changing sea levels, potentially enhanced by global warming, threaten coastlines around the world. Estimates of past and current sea-level changes, however, remain uncertain and controversial. The uncertainty has been incorporated into policy discussions, including the 2001 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, which gives a range of 1 to 2 millimeters of annual sea-level rise with large error bars. Now, a team of researchers from Australia and Canada says its recalculation is the most thorough yet, confirming higher estimates of sea-level rise. Scientists, however, continue to debate the causes of the changes.

Using global altimeter measurements taken by the TOPEX/Poseidon satellite over the past decade, John Church of CSIRO and his co-workers matched those data to historic tide-gage measurements around the world. From behavior recorded by satellite, they could extrapolate the behavior of sea level in regions where tide gages were sparse, extending the sea-level changes statistically over the past half-century, from 1950 to 2000. Church’s team ran their reconstruction multiple times to test the reliability of the tide gages and their changing geographic distributions.

Over that half-century, they report in the July 1 Journal of Climate, sea level has been rising by 1.8 millimeters a year, plus or minus 0.3 millimeters. One key finding is that sea-level rise varies regionally across the planet. The eastern Pacific has tongues of water north and south of the equator rising at a maximum rate of 3 millimeters a year (Tuvalu sits toward the edge of the southern tongue), while a central equatorial band in the Pacific has only seen a 1.5-millimeter annual increase in sea level. The eastern Indian Ocean also is rising at only 1.5 millimeters a year, but the northeastern Indian Ocean has a maximum sea-level rise of 2.5 millimeters a year.

Walter Munk of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography calls the work “a very good summary of where we stand.” But, he says, “the paper says nothing about the cause of the rise, nor does it pretend to.”

Munk and Peter Wadhams of the University of Cambridge recently reassessed the components of sea-level rise. Traditionally, most scientists have accepted that sea level is rising because of warming oceans, which expand, and also from other inputs of water, including melting glaciers and more precipitation. But the introduction of fresh water into the oceans from melting sea ice, largely ignored in past research, may also be important in assessing sea-level rise measurements, Munk and Wadhams suggest in the June 12 Geophysical Research Letters.

Quantifying each of these components is difficult, and using current estimates provides a lower value for sea-level rise than Church’s team’s number, at around 1 millimeter a year, Wadhams and Munk calculate. “Satellites and tide gages do suggest that the actual rates are higher,” Wadhams says, which means that something is wrong with the water source census. “We need to find 1.3 millimeters per year from melting ice sheets,” Munk says.

But the controversy comes with trying to determine why the sum of sea-level rise is greater than its parts. “You’ve got to really struggle to explain that” high rate of observed sea-level increase, says Philip Woodworth of the Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory in Liverpool.

Woodworth, who has co-authored past assessments of sea-level rise, including with Church and others for the 2001 IPCC report, suggests that although “passing the buck” to melting glaciers works to some extent, the bigger unknowns come from continental contributions of freshwater. These have remained difficult to pin down.

Church also says there is “still some missing component”; he suspects it may be an underestimate of ocean expansion from warming, something he is trying to calculate as rigorously as his team did for sea-level changes. As for consensus on whether his group’s new sea-level rise numbers are right, he says, “we’ll have to wait and see.”

The new numbers indicate that Tuvalu lost a mere 20 centimeters of height over a century — but with the rate of sea-level rise projected to increase in the next century, its low-lying atolls stand to lose a good deal of area. Other coastal nations, such as Bangladesh, will also continue to see sea levels slowly rise and threaten their communities.

Naomi Lubick

Back to top

Untitled Document

Geotimes Home | AGI Home | Information Services | Geoscience Education | Public Policy | Programs | Publications | Careers

© 2014 American Geological Institute. All rights reserved. Any copying, redistribution or retransmission of any of the contents of this service without the express written consent of the American Geological Institute is expressly prohibited. For all electronic copyright requests, visit: