Geotimes Magazine
Subscribe

Geotimes is now
    EARTH

Archives

Classifieds
Advertise
Customer Service
Geotimes Search

GeoMarketplace Link



EARTH magazine cover


 
News Notes
Human evolution
Neanderthal DNA unraveled

Probing fossil DNA for the genetic information of a long-extinct species might sound like a feat fit for Hollywood. For two research teams, however, the stunt is starting to become reality, as they have begun to unravel the genetic code of Neanderthals — a close, yet extinct, relative of modern humans.

Vindija cave in Croatia kept a 38,000-year-old Neanderthal fossil relatively free from human and biological contamination. Researchers extracted DNA from the fossil to begin mapping the Neanderthal genome. Photograph is by Johannes Krause, Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology.

Previously, researchers were limited to studying Neanderthals by examining archaeological remains and the fossil record, which revealed information such as body structure and migration routes. By the late 1990s, researchers had the tools to begin looking at Neanderthals through their DNA. Such research was limited, however, to DNA contributions from the mother via mitochondrial DNA, which could tell them about connections between species and where they came from, but not the entire genetic picture. Now, two groups publishing separate papers Nov. 16 in Science and Nature say that advances in technology have allowed them to test nuclear DNA, which exposed much more of the biology of Neanderthals, and when the ancestors of Neanderthals and humans diverged.

Researchers sequence DNA to determine the order of the chemical building blocks of DNA, called base pairs, which can tell researchers how their subjects live, survive and reproduce. The Human Genome Project, for example, sequenced the 3 billion base pairs in human DNA. The technique is possible for fossil DNA too, and has been used on extinct animals such as cave bears and woolly mammoths (see Geotimes, May 2006). But fossilized Neanderthal DNA has the potential to reveal connections between humans and their Neanderthal relatives, and how Neanderthals evolved over time. “Most people like the Neanderthal because that says something about us,” says Hendrik Poinar, a paleogeneticist from McMaster University, not associated with either study.

To begin sequencing Neanderthal DNA, the teams first had to find suitable Neanderthal fossils that were relatively free from human and bacterial contamination — something that’s exceedingly hard to find. The teams chose to use DNA pulled from a 38,000-year-old Neanderthal femur found in a cave in Croatia. The bone itself is “rather small and uninteresting,” says Svante Pääbo of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, and part of the team publishing in Nature. But the bone’s insignificance was “fortunate,” he says, as it had been “thrown in a big box and not handled much by humans.”

Armed with Neanderthal DNA, the two teams set out with two different study approaches. Richard Green of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, who headed the Nature study, used a new technique called pyrosequencing, which sequences the DNA directly and increases the amount of DNA processed by about 100 times when compared to traditional methods, according to David Lambert and Craig Millar in a News and Views story in the Nov. 16 Science. With this technology, the team sequenced more than 1 million base pairs of the nuclear DNA.

Meanwhile, James Noonan of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, who headed the study published in Science, stuck with a more classical method called metagenomics, and sequenced 65,000 base pairs of Neanderthal DNA. Although this method is slower than pyrosequencing, the team can target specific sequences of interest, says Edward Rubin of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, who worked with the team.

The teams next used their sequenced Neanderthal DNA and compared it to existing chimpanzee and human DNA. That information, along with estimated genetic mutation rates and the sizes of early populations gleaned from other research, allowed the teams to estimate the time at which the ancestors of humans and Neanderthals split.

Green’s group arrived at an average divergence time of about 500,000 years ago, whereas Noonan’s team placed the split at about 370,000 years ago. As more sequences are performed, however, those numbers could “come together,” Rubin says, as both studies account for only a small portion of the approximately 3 billion base pairs in the Neanderthal genome. And so far, Rubin says that researchers have not seen any evidence of “mixing” between Neanderthals and humans, although the “data does not exclude it.”

Noonan’s group’s more classical method is “probably more solid,” Poinar says, but he says that the method used by Green and colleagues is the “way forward,” due to the large portion of the genome remaining to be sequenced. Both studies, however, are a “proof of principle,” he says, addressing how to deal with the ever-present issue of contamination. Identifying specific genes of interest, however, such as those that determine skin color and language skills, is still likely “several years down the road,” he says.

Kathryn Hansen

Links:
"Mapping a Woolly Mammoth’s DNA," Geotimes, May 2006

This story originally appeared online Nov. 15, 2006, and is now available in the Geotimes Web Extra archive at http://www.geotimes.org/nov06/WebExtra111506_2.html.

Back to top

 

Untitled Document

Geotimes Home | AGI Home | Information Services | Geoscience Education | Public Policy | Programs | Publications | Careers

© 2014 American Geological Institute. All rights reserved. Any copying, redistribution or retransmission of any of the contents of this service without the express written consent of the American Geological Institute is expressly prohibited. For all electronic copyright requests, visit: http://www.copyright.com/ccc/do/showConfigurator?WT.mc_id=PubLink