Jingle Ruppert

Click here to pick up where
the print version left off.

With coal consumption continuing to rise, U.S. coal research remains focused on developing more environmentally sound ways to extract and utilize it. In 1999, world coal consumption stood at 4.7 billion short tons (bst). The U.S. Energy Information Agency predicts world consumption to grow to 6.8 bst by 2020. Over the same time period, U.S. consumption is projected to increase from 1,082 to 1,364 bst. Currently, domestic coal produces more than half of the electricity in the United States. The Bush administration's National Energy Policy, released in May 2001, estimated that the nation's demand for coal will rise by 45 percent over the next 20 years. Natural gas will generate much of the new electrical capacity, but existing coal-fired units will be used for many years. If natural gas supplies cannot meet the expected future demand, gas prices will rise, providing additional incentives for utilities to build new coal-fired power plants equipped with state-of-the-art emission-control devices. Either way, coal will continue to be a significant component of the overall electrical generating capacity in this country and around the world.

Power plant emissions

Over the past two decades, a number of gaseous emissions regulations have impacted the specifications of fuel used by coal-fired electrical generators. In the United States, limits on sulfur-dioxide emissions have increased usage of lower sulfur coal, particularly coal from the Powder River Ba
sin in Wyoming and the central Appalachian Basin in West Virginia and Kentucky. Utilities continue to burn higher sulfur coal, though, by blending, using emission credits, and installing pollution control devices such as flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) units. Installation of FGD units has the added benefit of producing FGD gypsum for the manufacture of wallboard. Over 3.3 million tons of FGD gypsum was used in wallboard manufacture in 2000 in the U.S. and the amount is expected to increase as stricter emission standards force more utilities to employ FGD.

Mercury emissions regulations will be the next air-quality issue faced by the U.S. coal and utility industries. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates that more than 43 tons of mercury were emitted by coal-fired utilities in 1999, more than 50 percent of it by seven major coal-consuming states, led by Texas and Pennsylvania. Some regulation of mercury emissions will be proposed by the EPA in December 2003. Any restrictive regulation will further affect the fuel choice of utilities and could also impact the quality of coal combustion by-products. Higher sulfur coal, however, may actually benefit from such regulations, as beneficiation methods used to clean mercury from coal are likely to remove sulfur as well.

Pollution control technologies

"Clean Coal Technologies" include new pollution-control and power-generating processes that reduce hazardous air emissions and lower greenhouse gases. These technologies are expected to increase the attractiveness of coal as a fuel source for existing and new electrical generation plants. The U.S. Department of Energy's Vision 21 program, with numerous combustion options, is taking the lead in funding clean coal research through pilot studies with private companies.

Many research agencies around the world, particularly in Europe, are conducting carbon sequestration research, another promising pollution-control process. The U.S. Midcontinent Interactive Digital Carbon Atlas and Relational Database, a consortium of the state geological surveys of Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, and Kansas, is funded to inventory locations of large stationary carbon-dioxide sources, including coal-fired power plants, fertilizer plants, and steel mills, and to compile potential sequestration sites, such as unmineable coal beds and depleted oil and gas reservoirs. Some carbon dioxide is already being "sequestered" in oil and natural gas reservoirs, where it is used to flush out that part of the resource that cannot be removed by conventional recovery. Carbon dioxide can also be used to recover coalbed methane (CBM) that is adsorbed onto the surface of coal. Research shows that carbon dioxide may bond to coal more efficiently than hydrogen, thereby displacing the methane gas and pushing it out of the reservoir.

Coal and coalbed methane resources

Reliance on coal for electricity requires an understanding and accounting of coal and CBM resources. CBM currently accounts for about 8 percent of the total U.S. natural gas production; one of the hottest onshore gas plays in the conterminous United States are the subbituminous coals of the Powder River Basin. The discovery that low-rank coal can produce vast amounts of CBM has initiated assessments and exploration all over the world for economic gas deposits from low-rank coal fields. Currently, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is assessing CBM resources in the United States, concentrating on the geologic controls of CBM occurrence and recoverability and the environmental implications of developing the resource, which include the gradual depletion of local water resources and concerns about the disposal of waters produced from CBM production.

The USGS, in cooperation with numerous state geological surveys, is completing a National Coal Resource Assessment. The agency and cooperators assessed the top-producing coal beds and zones in the nation's five coal-producing regions - the Rocky Mountains and Northern Great Plains, Colorado Plateau, Appalachian Basin, Gulf Coast, and Illinois Basin. The assessment has created publicly available databases and digital maps, which answer a variety of questions of importance to government, nongovernment, industry, and public decision-makers and provide interpretive information in a digital format on the geology and geochemistry of the most important U.S. coal resources. In the 27 coal fields assessed, the USGS estimates that about 1,600 bst of coal remain.

Many state geological surveys have created additional sets of digital coal resource maps, GIS map layers, and resource estimates. The West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey is undertaking perhaps the most ambitious assessment by compiling digital maps of all mined and unmined coal beds throughout that state.
Given current economic, environmental, and technological restrictions, the lower sulfur coal beds of the Powder River Basin, Colorado Plateau, and central Appalachian Basin will dominate U.S. coal production in the coming decades.

Back to index

Ruppert is a coal geologist and inorganic petrologist with the USGS' Eastern Energy Resources Team. She has an extensive background working with coal-quality issues, particularly trace elements in coal.

Pierce is a coal geologist and organic petrologist, working primarily on issues of coal petrology and coal quality. She is associate energy program coordinator for the USGS Energy Program. E-mail

James Hower is a coal geologist and organic petrologist with the Center for Applied Energy Research at the University of Kentucky. His research interests focus on applied organic petrology, especially related to combustion technologies.

Geotimes Home | AGI Home | Information Services | Geoscience Education | Public Policy | Programs | Publications | Careers

© 2019 American Geological Institute. All rights reserved. Any copying, redistribution or retransmission of any of the contents of this service without the express written consent of the American Geological Institute is expressly prohibited. For all electronic copyright requests, visit: