 
 
The big news in petroleum geology could very well sprout from research at ExxonMobil 
  that could help provide a new foundation for understanding the process of how 
  sedimentary bodies evolve. This understanding is key for predicting where oil 
  reservoirs might be found. The work could also give new impetus to the concept 
  of fractals in geoscience.
  
  Hydrocarbon reservoir performance is controlled by the spatial distribution 
  of properties ranging from pore network aspects seen at the scale of a core 
  plug to the distribution and connectivity of sand bodies that are only resolvable 
  at large seismic scales. Studies of modern environments and outcrops have long 
  been used to create analogs that span this range of scales. But always, uncertainty 
  remains over how applicable a modern analog is to a specific subsurface dataset. 
  Thus, emerging exploration and production technology has been focused on reducing 
  uncertainty in describing a reservoir and in developing the clearest possible 
  picture of reservoir geometry and connectivity. 
  
  During the annual convention of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists 
  in May, the ExxonMobil researchers reported results from a multiyear study of 
  an integrated suite of datasets that included modern and ancient (outcrop and 
  subsurface) depositional systems, high-resolution 3-D seismic, laboratory experiments 
  and numerical modeling. Their work could be a major step forward in understanding 
  reservoir geology. 
  
  They propose that the clastic sedimentary rock record is built of scale-invariant 
  hierarchies of sedimentary bodies. These bodies are deposited by jet-plume pairs 
  as they dissipate excess kinetic energy and minimize gradients. If the team 
  is are correct, the findings could provide a fundamental understanding for describing, 
  interpreting and predicting the types and distributions of sedimentary bodies 
  within a unifying framework. Such a framework would be significantly more useful 
  than the narrower perspective of depositional environment or scale. 
  
  These results also have important implications for increasing the ease with 
  which reservoir models can be built and for reducing the uncertainty in the 
  prediction and geologic modeling of hydrocarbon reservoir properties. This is 
  especially true if a physics-based jet-plume pair numerical model can be used 
  to model sand body shape and to understand the link between 3-D-sediment body 
  shape and the grain-size distribution and related parameters such as permeability. 
  
  
  They presented the hypothesis that most coarse-grained siliciclastic deposits 
  are composed of bodies with a strong commonality in shape, internal structure 
  and property distribution and that these similarities extend over a range of 
  depositional environments, depositional styles and dimensions. The commonality 
  arises from the fact that they all arise from turbulent jet deposition (D.C. 
  J. D. Hoyal et al. 2003 AAPG Annual Convention).If this hypothesis is correct, 
  then reservoir models can be built of such objects without reliance on any specific 
  analog. 
  
  Combining detailed measurements on several hundred sedimentary-body shapes, 
  from a variety of depositional environments, perimeter/arithmetic length cross 
  plots and box counts of shape parameters, shows that the shapes are self-affine. 
  Area/geometric length cross plots and principal component analyses show that 
  these shapes are statistically similar. The measured bodies range in length 
  from 1,000 kilometers to less than 10 centimeters and span 14 orders of magnitude 
  of area (John C. Van Wagoner, et al.). A three-component model including length, 
  and two parameters which characterize width variation along the central axis, 
  was able to fit 88 percent of body shape variability from the population (Paul 
  A. Dunn et al.).
  
  These data clearly suggest that something more fundamental than depositional 
  environment and scale may be acting as a first-order control on the properties 
  of coarse-grained siliciclastic bodies. The self-affine nature of the sand body 
  shapes further indicates that siliciclastic strata are arranged into bundles 
  of nested, hierarchical bodies or deposits. The shape of these deposits is independent 
  of scale and place of deposition because they are all deposited by common physical 
  processes (D.C. J. D. Hoyal et al.).
  
  According to the ExxonMobil investigators, non-equilibrium open systems (i. 
  e. systems through which energy and matter are transmitted) evolve toward increasing 
  complexity as they attempt to reach equilibrium. They evolve by creating dissipative 
  structures that rid the system of excess kinetic energy in order to minimize 
  gradients. A tree or leaf shape, for example, is most efficient in transferring 
  the entropy that dissipation transfers to the surrounding environment. 
  
  The most common mechanism to decelerate a flow {emdash} spatial expansion {emdash} 
  creates flow separation, shear layers and a turbulent jet. The jet (or jet-plume 
  pair) is a branching structure defined as "an internally driven flow from 
  an orifice or region of flow constriction that expands and decelerates through 
  turbulent flow entrainment into a body of the same or similar fluid," the 
  team reported. According to these investigators, turbulent jet deposits may 
  be the most fundamental and ubiquitous identifiable bodies in the clastic sedimentary 
  record. Jets produce sedimentary bodies such as current rippled beds, troughs 
  and planar cross beds. They also play a major role in forming bars in rivers, 
  as well as delta mouths and deepwater fans. Jet deposits, regardless of scale, 
  exhibit one or more of the following properties: 1) thickness and grain size 
  decay approximately exponentially in the direction of flow and a Gaussian distribution 
  across the body; 2) a region of erosion and bypass bounded by levees near the 
  orifice; 3) a proximal region of bed-form deposition and a distal region of 
  suspended load deposition; 4) the distribution of bedding types changes predictably 
  with the radial distance from the orifice (John C. Van Wagoner, et al.).
  
  Apart from the expansion angle, jet-plume pair deposits exhibit a large degree 
  of similarity in all environments where jets dominate over ambient flow and 
  where re-working by other processes has not obscured them. The properties of 
  these jet-plume pair deposits are strongly correlated to their shape through 
  the turbulent flow field and depositional process (D.C. J. D. Hoyal et al.). 
  Physics-based models of jet-plume pair deposition can be used to understand 
  the link between 3-D-sediment body shape and the grain-size distribution, a 
  link that which appears to be fundamental to the turbulent deposition process 
  (R.T. Beaubouef et al.).
  
  Over time, jet deposits evolve into more complex sedimentary bodies in which 
  the jets migrate to the periphery of the body where they can most effectively 
  dissipate energy. Depositional experiments suggest that sedimentary bodies pass 
  through three evolutionary phases. The initial phase is a single jet and jet 
  deposit. The jet deposit evolves into a deposit that mimics a leaf pattern and 
  finally a tree-like deposit. This evolution is reflected in the scale of different 
  deposits. Small features, such as current ripples and cross beds, are deposited 
  by single jets of brief duration. Bars and other intermediate scale features 
  form from more persistent jets. Larger scale sedimentary bodies, such as deltas 
  or fans, evolve in response to multiple flows from a persistent primary orifice 
  (John C. Van Wagoner, et al.).
  
  Back to index
|  | Geotimes Home | AGI Home | Information Services | Geoscience Education | Public Policy | Programs | Publications | Careers  |